Methods and limits
How the data was collected, cleaned and scored, what this site cannot tell you, and where SI tools were used. Everything here can be rebuilt from the public repository with one command.
Read these before relying on anything
- Relevance is not safety.
- The score orders investigations by how closely they relate to a scenario. It says nothing about whether a material or a cabin is safe, and it is not a probability.
- Missing is not zero.
- An empty value means PSI's table does not report it. It does not mean the quantity was zero or that it did not matter.
- Close on the map is not the same test.
- Two tests at the same oxygen and pressure can differ in airflow, material, shape, sample size and how they were ignited. The map shows two conditions out of many.
- A gap is relative to this archive.
- No tests near a scenario means none in the PSI experimental tables read here. Drop-tower and ground tests, and results published only in papers, are outside it.
- A matching quote is not a review.
- Every curated statement carries a quotation that the build checks, character for character, against NASA's text. That proves where a statement comes from. It does not prove the statement is right, and no combustion scientist has reviewed this site.
- All flight tests here ran in microgravity.
- PSI holds no test at lunar or Martian gravity. Microgravity and normal gravity can only bracket what happens in between.
- Some pressures are assumed.
- Several tables do not list pressure. Where an experiment ran in the station cabin or in the Cygnus vehicle, cabin pressure is used and the value is marked as assumed and drawn hollow.
Where the data comes from
All data is read from NASA's Physical Sciences Informatics repository, which NASA releases under CC0. The 24 investigations in the Combustion Science research area hold 13.5 TB of raw files. This site does not read the raw video or sensor files. It reads the experimental table that each team published: 25 tables, 2,143 rows, 28,316 values.
NASA names PSI as the data source for this challenge. For background it points to its Researcher's Guide to International Space Station Combustion Science and its Combustion Science pages. This site does not read either of them yet.
One more NASA file is read: the ReadMe that PSI holds for BASS-II. It says what the table's Air display column is (“flow speed measured in the duct in cm/s”), and that sentence is the stated source of every BASS-II air speed on this site.
1
Raw
Exact copies of what PSI served: the index of investigations, each investigation record, and every experimental table. Each file is stored with its fetch time and SHA-256 checksum and is never edited.
2
Staged
The raw files parsed into tidy tables. PSI's own column names and values are kept as they are.
3
Curated
Every column of every table mapped onto one dictionary of variables, with units converted. Each value keeps the raw cell it came from and a quality label.
4
Serving
The curated files loaded into a Postgres database, which is what this site reads.
Where each value comes from
Every one of the 28,316 values carries one of five labels. Click any row in the data to see its label, the raw PSI cell, and the note or quotation behind it.
| Label | Meaning | Values | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSI table | Read directly from a cell of a PSI experimental table. Only the unit was converted. | 20,902 | 73.8% |
| NASA text | Not a table cell, but stated in NASA's own text. The supporting quote is shown. | 6,422 | 22.7% |
| Assumed | Stated nowhere in PSI. The note says what was assumed. | 579 | 2.0% |
| Derived | Computed from other values of the same record. | 361 | 1.3% |
| Repaired | A PSI cell that was repaired. The note says what was changed and why. | 52 | 0.2% |
What was repaired, left out or flagged
The tables were typed by hand over two decades and contain slips. Nothing is changed silently. This is the complete log.
- BREColumn 'Oxygen Conc (percent)': '3400%' read as '34' in 1 row(s). A percent format was applied to the number 34 in the PSI table; the column is already in percent.
- BREColumn 'Oxygen Conc (percent)': '2100%' read as '21' in 1 row(s). A percent format was applied to the number 21 in the PSI table; the column is already in percent.
- CLD FlameColumn 'Fuel Bottle': 26 cell(s) were damaged by spreadsheet drag-fill (for example 40% CH5, 40% CH6, 40% CH7, 40% CH8, 40% CH9) and were restored to the first value of each run.
- E-FIELD Flames11 continuation row(s) were folded into the test day they belong to (they list further values of Fuel Conc).
- s-FlamePSI's server cut this record off before the end. Every field up to the cut is used; later fields were filled from PSI's search index.
- s-FlameColumn 'Atmosphere*': 6 cell(s) were damaged by spreadsheet drag-fill (for example ~21% O2 with N3, ~21% O2 with N4, ~21% O2 with N5, ~21% O2 with N6) and were restored to the first value of each run.
- s-FlameColumn 'Fuel Bottle': 2 cell(s) were damaged by spreadsheet drag-fill (for example 50% C2H4 with N3, 45% CH4 with N3) and were restored to the first value of each run.
- BASS-IIOxygen at end of test: 3 value(s) fall outside the expected range 0.05 to 1 fraction (1.6, 0.6, 0.9). They are kept exactly as published, flagged, and left out of charts.
- BASS-IIOxygen at end of test: 2 value(s) are more than 2 points above the oxygen at the start of the same test. Burning uses oxygen up, so this cannot be a reading of the same air. They are kept exactly as published, flagged, and left out of charts.
- BASS-IIM17, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv gives "extinction" (row 43, column Air display). The first is the one used.
- BASS-IIM17, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Science Documents_BASS-II_Test.Matrices.xlsx gives "extinction" (Miller!H18). The first is the one used.
- BASS-IIP5, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv gives "extinction" (row 79, column Air display). The first is the one used.
- BASS-IIP5, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Science Documents_BASS-II_Test.Matrices.xlsx gives "extinction" (Fernandez-Pello!H7). The first is the one used.
- BASS-IIP13a, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv gives "extinction" (row 85, column Air display). The first is the one used.
- BASS-IIP13a, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Science Documents_BASS-II_Test.Matrices.xlsx gives "extinction" (Fernandez-Pello!H13). The first is the one used.
- BASS1 row(s) are not tests and were left out: A cleaning step
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 17236.3 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 17314.3 particles/cm³ (Voice Down Data Summary!B21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 17236.3 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 17314.3 particles/cm³ (Data!C23). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 17236.3 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 17314.3 particles/cm³ (Data!B21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 16589.4 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 17256.2 particles/cm³ (Voice Down Data Summary!E21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 16589.4 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 17256.2 particles/cm³ (Data!G23). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 16589.4 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 17256.2 particles/cm³ (Data!E21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 26578 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 24350 particles/cm³ (Voice Down Data Summary!H21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 26578 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 24350 particles/cm³ (Data!K23). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 26578 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 24522.2 particles/cm³ (Data!H21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 45.6343 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 43.15 mg/m³ (Voice Down Data Summary!C21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 45.6343 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 43.15 mg/m³ (Data!D23). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 45.6343 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 43.15 mg/m³ (Data!C21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 33.8377 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 34.0875 mg/m³ (Voice Down Data Summary!F21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 33.8377 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 34.0875 mg/m³ (Data!H23). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 33.8377 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 34.0875 mg/m³ (Data!F21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 62.6509 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 63.1833 mg/m³ (Voice Down Data Summary!I21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 62.6509 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 63.1833 mg/m³ (Data!L23). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle mass concentration (DustTrak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 62.6509 mg/m³; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 63.2889 mg/m³ (Data!I21). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.71639 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.68213 µm (Voice Down Data Summary!B25). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.71639 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 1.68213 µm (Data!C27). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #1 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.71639 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 1.68213 µm (Data!B25). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.57347 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.55674 µm (Voice Down Data Summary!E25). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.57347 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 1.55674 µm (Data!G27). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #2 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.57347 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 1.55674 µm (Data!E25). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.65121 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.70491 µm (Voice Down Data Summary!H25). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.65121 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_0611zgy time hist.xls gives 1.70491 µm (Data!K27). The first is the one used.
- DAFTDAFT-3 Sample Bag #3 (GMT 233, 2006), Particle diameter from the mass per particle (assumed density): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Retrieved Data Summary.xls gives 1.65121 µm; NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_ISS_Daft_Aug21_06 urban.xls gives 1.70186 µm (Data!H25). The first is the one used.
- DAFTSession D1, Particle number concentration (P-Trak): NASA's file PSI-47_Analyzed Data_DAFT Flight Data GMT053.xls gives 1.43189 particles/cm³; NASA's file PSI-47_Reports_DAFT_FinalReport.doc gives 2 to 5 particles/cm³ (section II.D.1 (DAFT-1 & DAFT -2, Session 1, GMT 54, 2005)). The first is the one used.
- FLEXSubscripts were lost in the PSI file: the columns "O", "N" and "CO initial ambient composition" are O2, N2 and CO2 (carbon dioxide is one of the suppressants FLEX tested).
- FLEXPressure: 1 value(s) fall outside the expected range 10 to 700 kPa (0). They are kept exactly as published, flagged, and left out of charts.
- Saffire-I2 row(s) are not tests and were left out: Pre-test flow visualization video
- Saffire-ISample S1, Sample width: the experimental table gives 94 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 40.6 cm (p. 29, Table I, row 1-1, column Width). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S1, Sample width: the experimental table gives 94 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 40.6 cm (p. 30, Table 1, row I-1, column Width). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S1, Sample thickness: the experimental table gives 3.7 mm; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 0.37 mm (p. 29, Table I, row 1-1, column Thickness). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S1, Sample thickness: the experimental table gives 3.7 mm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 0.37 mm (p. 30, Table 1, row I-1, column Thickness). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S1, Sample length: the experimental table gives 40.6 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 94 cm (p. 29, Table I, row 1-1, column Length). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S1, Sample length: the experimental table gives 40.6 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 94 cm (p. 30, Table 1, row I-1, column Length). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S2, Sample width: the experimental table gives 94 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 40.6 cm (p. 29, Table I, row 1-2, column Width). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S2, Sample width: the experimental table gives 94 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 40.6 cm (p. 30, Table 1, row I-2, column Width). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S2, Sample thickness: the experimental table gives 3.7 mm; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 0.37 mm (p. 29, Table I, row 1-2, column Thickness). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S2, Sample thickness: the experimental table gives 3.7 mm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 0.37 mm (p. 30, Table 1, row I-2, column Thickness). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S2, Sample length: the experimental table gives 40.6 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 10 cm (p. 29, Table I, row 1-2, column Length). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-ISample S2, Sample length: the experimental table gives 40.6 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 10 cm (p. 30, Table 1, row I-2, column Length). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-II2 row(s) are not tests and were left out: Pre-test flow visualization video
- Saffire-IIColumn 'Material': 2 blank cell(s) filled from the row above.
- Saffire-IIThe micro sign was lost in the PSI file: the columns "?-g Burn Length" and "?-g Spread Length" are the microgravity results.
- Saffire-IIThe column "?-g Spread Length" holds spread rates in mm/s, so it is mapped to flame spread rate.
- Saffire-IISample 2-1, Oxygen: the experimental table gives 0.215 fraction; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 0.221 fraction (p. 29, Table I, row 2-1, column Δ %O2). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IISample 2-1, Oxygen: the experimental table gives 0.215 fraction; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 0.221 fraction (p. 30, Table 1, row II-1, column Δ %O2). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IISample 2-6, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 20 cm/s; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 25 cm/s (p. 29, Table I, row 2-6, column Flow). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IISample 2-6, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 20 cm/s; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 25 cm/s (p. 30, Table 1, row II-6, column Flow). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IIColumn 'Samle Thickness': '037 mm' read as '0.37 mm' in 3 row(s). Decimal point missing in the PSI table (the other samples are 0.27 to 1.03 mm).
- Saffire-IIISample S1, Sample thickness: the experimental table gives 3.3 mm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 0.37 mm (p. 30, Table 1, row III-1, column Thickness). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IIISample S1, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 30 cm/s; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 25 cm/s (p. 30, Table 1, row III-1, column Flow). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IIISample S2, Sample thickness: the experimental table gives 3.3 mm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 0.37 mm (p. 30, Table 1, row III-2, column Thickness). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IIISample S2, Sample length: the experimental table gives 94 cm; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 10 cm (p. 30, Table 1, row III-2, column Length). The table's value is the one used.
- Saffire-IIISample S2, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 30 cm/s; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 25 cm/s (p. 30, Table 1, row III-2, column Flow). The table's value is the one used.
- SAME4 row(s) say 'same conditions as' other rows; they are kept as envelopes listing those conditions.
- SPICEFlow speed: 8 value(s) fall outside the expected range 0 to 200 cm/s (-0.28, -5.92). They are kept exactly as published, flagged, and left out of charts.
- SPICEDay 45 17:27:48, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 17.59 cm/s; NASA's file PSI-107_Raw Data_SmokePointReview-0g-3.xlsx gives 17.587 cm/s (Smoke Point Datasheet (2)!AP10). The table's value is the one used.
- SPICEDay 173 12:39:29, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 38.27 cm/s; NASA's file PSI-107_Raw Data_SmokePointReview-0g-3.xlsx gives 38.2718 cm/s (Smoke Point Datasheet (2)!AP30). The table's value is the one used.
- SPICEDay 174 11:04:43, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 29.81 cm/s; NASA's file PSI-107_Raw Data_SmokePointReview-0g-3.xlsx gives 29.8098 cm/s (Smoke Point Datasheet (2)!AP44). The table's value is the one used.
- SPICEDay 174 12:46:17, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 31.69 cm/s; NASA's file PSI-107_Raw Data_SmokePointReview-0g-3.xlsx gives 31.6902 cm/s (Smoke Point Datasheet (2)!AP54). The table's value is the one used.
How the ranking score works
The score is arithmetic, written in one file of the repository, and runs in your browser. No language model takes part in it. It is the weighted sum of five parts, each between 0 and 1, shown as 0 to 100.
| Part | Weight | How it is computed |
|---|---|---|
| Conditions | 30% | Distance from the scenario to each of the investigation's tests, in steps: one step is 3 percentage points of oxygen, or a 25% change in pressure. The part combines the closest test (65%) with how many tests sit nearby (35%). A test with matching oxygen but no reported pressure earns 50% credit. Inverse flames are excluded, because their oxygen value is the burner stream. An investigation with no oxygen value is shown as not available, not as zero. |
| NASA focus | 20% | Three levels, each backed by a quotation: named by NASA as a spacecraft fire-safety study (1.0), supporting (0.67), or fundamental combustion science (0.33). |
| Fuel | 15% | 1.0 if the investigation burned the kind of fuel the scenario is concerned with, 0.7 if it was a gas burner built to stand in for that fuel, 0.25 otherwise. |
| Function | 15% | How much the investigation contributes to prevention, detection and suppression (0 to 3 each, with a quotation), averaged with the scenario's priority. |
| Data | 20% | How much there is to work with: number of itemized tests (half), number of variables reported in the table (three tenths), publications with a DOI (two tenths). |
The weights and the size of a step are judgements made for this project, not NASA values. They are constants in web/src/lib/scoring.ts, covered by tests, and easy to change.
How the Flame Lab and the coverage grid work
The Flame Lab is a replay, not a model. For the setting on its controls it finds the FLEX droplet tests of the same fuel that are closest, and shows what happened in them. Distance is counted in steps: one step is 3 points of oxygen, 5 points of carbon dioxide or helium, a 25% change in pressure, or 1.5 mm of droplet size. A test within one step counts as measured here, within two as close. Beyond two steps the lab replays the single nearest real test, says how far away it is and at what conditions it ran, and makes no claim about your setting.
The outcome shown is the most common one among up to nine nearby tests, and the figures are their middle values. Because a bigger droplet takes longer to burn, burn time is compared as seconds per square millimetre of starting size and then scaled to the droplet size on the control. The picture and the chart show the droplet shrinking from its starting size to the size at which the burn ended, with its size squared falling steadily in between; the table gives only the two ends. When your air differs from plain station air, the same droplet in station air is replayed beside it. The flame's shape and colour are drawn.
The lab has two more benches that work the same way. The plastic and fabric bench replays BASS-II: for a sample and a starting oxygen level it shows the carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen readings taken from the chamber air after the nearest tests. One step there is 1 point of oxygen, or a 25% change in rod diameter, or a 50% change in sheet thickness. An oxygen reading that appears to rise during a test, or to fall by more than five points, is treated as a reading error and left out. The gas flame bench replays the CFI-G tests in which the oxygen was in the chamber air: whether each flame lit and how it ended. Its burn time and burner temperature are taken over the nearby tests that lit. The CFI-G flames fed with oxygen through the burner are not included, because that oxygen is not cabin air.
The dashboard's analysis starts from every row in the archive and keeps, step by step, only the rows that also match what burns, report the oxygen in the air around the flame, sit within 3 points of the cabin's oxygen, are also close in pressure, and were run at the cabin's gravity. The first step that leaves no rows is marked as where the evidence runs out. The sentences beside it are assembled from those counts by fixed rules; no model writes them.
The coverage grid on the dashboard counts test rows by fuel and by the oxygen in the surrounding air, in seven bands. Rows where the oxygen figure is the stream fed through a burner are left out, and so are rows with no oxygen value. The Moon and Mars rows are empty because no row in the archive was measured at either gravity.
Where SI tools were used
SI is NASA's term in this challenge for super intelligence: language models, image and video generators and coding tools.
- Building the site
- The code, the data pipeline and this text were written with Claude (Anthropic), working with the team.
- Reading the investigations
- The one-line summaries, the fire-safety level, the prevention, detection and suppression ratings and the short insights were written by the SI after reading each PSI record. Each carries a quotation, and the build stops if a quotation is not found in NASA's text.
- Answering questions
- In the SI panel beside each feature, the SI answers by running fixed lookups over this database, lists them, and its figures are checked against what they returned. The questions the site suggests use wording prepared ahead of time, whether the live model is on or off; their lookups and the number check still run on every request. Any other question goes to a language model hosted on Amazon Bedrock (gpt-oss-120b, an open model from OpenAI), and an answer it has already given to the same question about the same cabin is shown again for a few hours. The Listen button reads an answer aloud with ElevenLabs where that is set up, and otherwise with the voice built into the browser; the words are the ones on the screen.
- Images
- Every photograph and every piece of footage is NASA's. The line drawings of cabins, scenes and the three fire-safety jobs, the short animations of them, and the two white models that can be turned (a lunar habitat and a droplet chamber) are concept illustrations made with image and video models through Higgsfield (FLUX.2, Seedance 2.5, Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2.6). They show an idea and are not NASA designs or hardware. Each one carries a visible SI-generated mark, in the picture and beside it, and none contains a NASA logo, flag or mission badge. The candle flame on the home page that changes with gravity, and the droplet flame in the Flame Lab, are drawings made in code; the Flame Lab's timing and outcomes come from NASA's tests. None of these pictures is evidence.
- The home page
- Earth, Mars, the Moon and the space station are NASA's own 3D models (Earth and Mars: NASA/JPL-Caltech, from NASA Science 3D resources; the Moon: NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio, from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter data; the station: NASA's ISS model). They are drawn in the browser with three.js. The flame between them is a drawing made in code, and its shape at the Moon's and Mars's gravity is a guess: no test exists there. NASA's downlink recordings in the Flame Lab are played with mpegts.js.
- Not used for
- The numbers. No value on the map, in the tables or in the ranking was produced or estimated by a model. They come from PSI's tables through code that is in the repository.
Source files
The exact PSI files this site was built from, with their checksums. Database built 2026-11-14.
| Investigation | PSI file | Rows | Kept | SHA-256 | Fetched |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flame Design | PSI-10_Experimental table_Flame Design_Inverse Flame.csv | 120 | 120 | 97933ee9ae0b | 2026-11-11 |
| Flame Design | PSI-10_Experimental table_Flame Design_Normal Flame.csv | 207 | 207 | 4a663292bd3f | 2026-11-11 |
| Saffire-III | PSI-100_Experimental table_SAFFIRE-3.csv | 2 | 2 | 4d3c717ec20d | 2026-11-11 |
| SAME-R | PSI-101_Experimental table_SAME-R.csv | 109 | 109 | 87164b7dc916 | 2026-11-11 |
| SAME | PSI-102_Experimental table_SAME.csv | 8 | 8 | 268d1e121d2f | 2026-11-11 |
| SLICE | PSI-106_Experimental table_Slice.csv | 12 | 12 | 89ef980810ca | 2026-11-11 |
| SPICE | PSI-107_Experimental table_Spice.csv | 469 | 469 | fb0d7e60cf53 | 2026-11-11 |
| Cool-flame transitions | PSI-142_Experimental table_Data Summary Table.csv | 8 | 8 | c66d135b0053 | 2026-11-11 |
| CFI-G | PSI-159_Experimental table_CFI-G_Inverse Flames.csv | 154 | 154 | d4d44f8b9896 | 2026-11-11 |
| CFI-G | PSI-159_Experimental table_CFI-G_Normal Flames.csv | 179 | 179 | d95a621c3fbd | 2026-11-11 |
| BRE | PSI-20_Experimental table_ACME BRE.csv | 18 | 18 | 4aa5d3f98708 | 2026-11-11 |
| CLD Flame | PSI-21_Experimental table_CLD Flame.csv | 32 | 32 | 9fafbc5b3ddd | 2026-11-11 |
| E-FIELD Flames | PSI-22_Experimental table_ACME E-FIELD Flames.csv | 32 | 21 | 69090c357b83 | 2026-11-11 |
| s-Flame | PSI-23_Experimental table_ACME s-Flame.csv | 18 | 18 | 16cd10f50bd2 | 2026-11-11 |
| BASS-II | PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv | 129 | 129 | 71e792bf6b5f | 2026-11-11 |
| BASS | PSI-26_Experimental table_BASS.csv | 122 | 121 | ccfc3c54d948 | 2026-11-11 |
| CFI | PSI-39_Evidence pack_PSI-39 | 148 | 148 | 2026-11-14 | |
| CFI | PSI-39_Experimental table_CFI.csv | 87 | 87 | fb898e287623 | 2026-11-11 |
| DAFT | PSI-47_Evidence pack_PSI-47 | 4 | 4 | 2026-11-13 | |
| DAFT | PSI-47_Experimental table_DAFT.csv | 2 | 2 | d9d1a436c6e7 | 2026-11-11 |
| FLEX-2 | PSI-68_Experimental table_Flex2.csv | 8 | 8 | cc57ad1bd997 | 2026-11-11 |
| FLEX | PSI-69_Evidence pack_PSI-69 | 2 | 2 | 2026-11-14 | |
| FLEX | PSI-69_Experimental table_FLEX.csv | 274 | 274 | 37c88ce8ae93 | 2026-11-11 |
| Saffire-I | PSI-98_Experimental table_SAFFIRE-1.csv | 4 | 2 | c01f29c62455 | 2026-11-11 |
| Saffire-II | PSI-99_Experimental table_SAFFIRE-2.csv | 15 | 9 | 3c24390b9ef8 | 2026-11-11 |