Experiments / Saffire flow duct
Saffire-IIA spacecraft fire-safety study
Spacecraft Fire Experiment - II
Burned nine smaller samples - silicone, cotton-fiberglass, acrylic and Nomex - and compared each with the same material at normal gravity.

What burned
Solid materials
Silicone, cotton fabric, acrylic plastic and 1 more
Where
In a cargo ship
After it left the space station, with no crew aboard
How much data
9 tests
Each one is a row in NASA's table
What they changed between tests
- sample material
- sample thickness
- flow direction
- igniter power
What it found
The sample card held nine materials so that flammability limits could be compared across them in one flight.
NASA's words
“the Saffire-II investigation added more samples including SIBAL, silicone, structure PMMA, flat PMMA, and PMMA with Nomex” PSI record
Summarized by the SI. Each summary is tied to a quotation that the build checks against NASA's text. A matching quote is not a scientific review.
What it helps with
Stopping a fire from starting
Which materials burn, and in what air
A main aim
Noticing a fire early
What smoke looks like to a detector
Touches on it
Putting a fire out
What makes a flame go out
Not an aim
For researchers: NASA's full recordThe conditions tested, every row of the table, NASA's description, publications and hardware
Shared hardware: A large flow duct flown in an uncrewed cargo ship after it left the station, so that a big fire could be lit safely. Experiments that shared hardware share its limits, so their results can be compared directly.
Why it counts as fire-safety research
“Flammability studies focus on solid materials such as fabrics and plastics, as studied in the Burning and Suppression of Solids (BASS and BASS-II) and Spacecraft Fire Safety Demonstration (Saffire-I, -II, and -III) investigations.” NASA challenge statement
NASA's words behind each rating
- Prevention3 of 3
“investigate the low-g flammability limits compared to those obtained in NASA’s normal gravity material flammability screening test”
- Detection1 of 3
“Instruments on an unmanned cargo vessel measure oxygen, carbon dioxide, heat, pressure and flame growth”
- Suppression0 of 3
Not an aim of this investigation.
Conditions covered
- Oxygen in the atmosphere
- 21.5% to 22.1%
- airMoon
- Pressure
- 102 kPa to 103 kPa
- Moonsea level
- Flow speed
- 20 cm/s
- Itemized rows
- 9
- 9 tests
Fuels and materials
Silicone (4), SIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass) (2), PMMA (2), Nomex + PMMA (1)
Measurements named in the PSI record
- Flame imaging
- Radiometry
- Thermocouples
- Gas analysis
- Flow velocity
How the tests differ, and how they are the same
Worked out from the 9 rows of the PSI table. A variable that is not listed was not reported, which is different from being held fixed.
Changed from test to test
- Oxygen
- 21.5% to 22.1%
- Pressure
- 102 kPa to 103 kPa
- Flow direction
- 2 different values
- Fuel or material
- 4 different values
- Sample thickness
- 0.27 mm to 10 mm
- Sample length
- 5 cm to 29 cm
- Igniter power
- 80 W to 97 W
- Ignition time
- 9.2 s to 30 s
- Burn time
- 115 s to 900 s
- Flame spread rate
- 2.1 mm/s to 2.6 mm/sreported in 4 of 9 rows
- Burn length
- 0 cm to 29 cm
- Flame spread rate at 1 g
- 0.6 mm/s to 1.2 mm/sreported in 7 of 9 rows
- Burn length at 1 g
- 0 cm to 7.6 cm
The same in every test
- Oxygen refers to
- ambient
- Flow speed
- 20 cm/s
- Fuel phase
- solid
- Sample width
- 5 cm
Reported for only some rows, with one value: geometry, ignited, how the test ended.
Rows from the PSI table
Click a row for the source of every value. Filter and export
| Record | Type | Fuel or material | Shape | Oxygen | Pressure | Flow, cm/s | Outcome | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 2-1 | Test | Silicone | 21.5% | 102 kPa | 20 | self-extinguished | ||
| Sample 2-2 | Test | Silicone | 22.1% | 102 kPa | 20 | self-extinguished | ||
| Sample 2-3 | Test | Silicone | 22.1% | 103 kPa | 20 | self-extinguished | ||
| Sample 2-4 | Test | Silicone | 22.1% | 103 kPa | 20 | self-extinguished | ||
| Sample 2-5 | Test | SIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass) | fabric sheet | 22.1% | 103 kPa | 20 | ||
| Sample 2-6 | Test | SIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass) | fabric sheet | 22.1% | 103 kPa | 20 | ||
| Sample 2-7 | Test | Nomex + PMMA | fabric sheet | 22.1% | 103 kPa | 20 | ||
| Sample 2-8 | Test | PMMA | 22% to 22.1% | 103 kPa | 20 | |||
| Sample 2-9 | Test | PMMA | 21.9% to 22% | 103 kPa | 20 |
How the table was read, and what was repaired
Saffire-II - samples
PSI-99_Experimental table_SAFFIRE-2.csv
15 rows in the file, 9 kept as records, 2 left out (Pre-test flow visualization video).
- The micro sign was lost in the PSI file: the columns "?-g Burn Length" and "?-g Spread Length" are the microgravity results.
- The column "?-g Spread Length" holds spread rates in mm/s, so it is mapped to flame spread rate.
- Note 1 Derived from measured CO2 production and referenced to initial O2 concentration reported by ISS.
- Note 2 The PMMA portion was completely consumed but the Nomex was not ignited.
- Note 3 This is the length of fuel with significant visible damage.
- Note 4 The flames remain anchored at the base of the sample which has a very slow regression rate (0.01 to 0.04 mm/s)
Assumed: Not listed in the PSI table. Taken as the cabin pressure of the Cygnus cargo vehicle.
sha256 3c24390b9ef86f3d1ebaab911a1a3cc95a8759aebf42062371370e6d4b31b8ac · fetched 2026-11-11
Repairs and warnings
- 2 row(s) are not tests and were left out: Pre-test flow visualization video
- Column 'Material': 2 blank cell(s) filled from the row above.
- The micro sign was lost in the PSI file: the columns "?-g Burn Length" and "?-g Spread Length" are the microgravity results.
- The column "?-g Spread Length" holds spread rates in mm/s, so it is mapped to flame spread rate.
- Sample 2-1, Oxygen: the experimental table gives 0.215 fraction; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 0.221 fraction (p. 29, Table I, row 2-1, column Δ %O2). The table's value is the one used.
- Sample 2-1, Oxygen: the experimental table gives 0.215 fraction; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 0.221 fraction (p. 30, Table 1, row II-1, column Δ %O2). The table's value is the one used.
- Sample 2-6, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 20 cm/s; NASA's file NTRS-20170008805.pdf gives 25 cm/s (p. 29, Table I, row 2-6, column Flow). The table's value is the one used.
- Sample 2-6, Flow speed: the experimental table gives 20 cm/s; NASA's file NTRS-20180005168.pdf gives 25 cm/s (p. 30, Table 1, row II-6, column Flow). The table's value is the one used.
- Column 'Samle Thickness': '037 mm' read as '0.37 mm' in 3 row(s). Decimal point missing in the PSI table (the other samples are 0.27 to 1.03 mm).
NASA's description
Objectives
The objectives of SAFFIRE-II are to determine how rapidly a large scale fire grows in low-gravity and to investigate the low-g flammability limits compared to those obtained in NASA’s normal gravity material flammability screening test.
Approach
The Saffire-II experiment was performed on the Orbital Science’s Cygnus resupply vehicle after it deberthed from the ISS. As a follow on to the Saffire-I investigation, the Saffire-II investigation added more samples including SIBAL, silicone, structure PMMA, flat PMMA, and PMMA with Nomex. The Saffire-1I flight unit had a sample card installed in the middle of a large flow duct. Air is drawn through the flow duct by fans located at the top of the duct with flow straighteners at the bottom of the experiment module. Saffire-II has a sample card that contains 9 samples, each 5 cm x 29 cm. Depending on the sample material, the Saffire-II was conducted at an air flow velocity of either 20 or 30 cm/s, the flow being either concurrent or opposed. Once the sample was ignited flame images were captured using two cameras. In addition, thermocouples provided flow, flame, and plume temperatures, two radiometers recorded flame radiation, solid state sensors were used to measure pressure, CO2 and O2 mole faction, and two anemometer tracked flow velocity. All data was compressed, and subsequently downlinked. Details related to samples and experimental parameters are provided in the Experimental Details file in the Science document folder.
Hypothesis
This investigation hypothesizes that due to large differences between fire behavior in normal and reduced gravity, the use of terrestrial fires and fire standards to design spacecraft fire safety systems presents an inherent risk to the vehicle because of the significant level of uncertainty. While this approach has been successful thus far, the uncertainty and risk will increase as exploration missions venture further from earth with considerably longer transit times for a safe return. There is a significant lack of microgravity data available for spacecraft designers on which to base their fire safety designs and procedures. To address this knowledge gap, this investigation proposed to conduct large-scale fire safety experiments in an expendable spacecraft without risk to a crew.
Research impacts and Earth benefits
The Saffire-II experiment provides a new way to study a realistic fire on an exploration vehicle, which has not been possible in the past because the risks are too high. Instruments on an unmanned cargo vessel measure oxygen, carbon dioxide, heat, pressure and flame growth, and two video cameras provide views of the flame. Results determine microgravity flammability limits for several spacecraft materials, help to validate NASA’s material selection criteria, and how microgravity and limited oxygen affect flame size. The investigation is crucial for the safety of current and future space missions. Studying fire in small, sealed environments such as the Cygnus cargo supply vehicle benefits fire safety and prevention efforts on Earth, including inside mines, airplanes, or submarines.
Publications
7 listed in PSI, 5 with a DOI.
- Buoyant Effects on the Flammability of Silicone Samples Planned for the Spacecraft Fire Experiment (Saffire), Conference: 45th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2015-[293] 12-16 July 2015, Bellevue, WashingtonJE Niehaus, PV Ferkul, SA Gokoglu, GA Ruff
- The Spacecraft Fire Experiment (Saffire) - Objectives, Development and StatusW Schoren, GA Ruff, DL Urban
- Flame spread: Effects of microgravity and scaleUrban David L., Ferkul Paul, Olson Sandra, Ruff Gary A., Easton John, T'ien James S., Liao Ya-Ting T., Li Chengyao, Fernandez-Pello Carlos, Torero Jose L., Legros Guillaume, Eigenbrod Christian, Smirnov Nickolay, Fujita Osamu, Rouvreau Sébastien, Toth Balazs, Jomaas Grunde
- Buoyancy effects on concurrent flame spread over thick PMMAThomsen Maria, Fernandez-Pello Carlos, Ruff Gary A., Urban David L.
- Concurrent Flame Spread Over Two-Sided Thick PMMA Slabs in MicrogravityOlson Sandra L., Urban David L., Ruff Gary A., Ferkul Paul V., Toth Balazs, Eigenbrod Christian, Meyer Florian, Jomaas Grunde
- Transient flame growth and spread processes over a large solid fabric in concurrent low-speed flows in microgravity – Model versus experimentLi Chengyao, Liao Ya-Ting T., T'ien James S., Urban David L., Ferkul Paul, Olson Sandra, Ruff Gary A., Easton John
Show the other 1
- Evaluation of gas and particle sensors for detecting spacecraft-relevant fire emissionsWang Xiaoliang, Zhou Hao, Arnott W. Patrick, Meyer Marit E., Taylor Samuel, Firouzkouhi Hatef, Moosmüller Hans, Chow Judith C., Watson John G.
Hardware and raw data
16.9 GB of raw data on PSI. FlameLens reads the experimental table, not the raw video or sensor files.
On Earth
Material flammability standards: Results test whether NASA's material selection criteria hold up, which informs flammability screening generally.
“help to validate NASA’s material selection criteria”