Experiments / Droplet apparatus (MDCA)
FLEX-2Supports fire safety
Flame Extinguishment Experiment - 2
Extended FLEX to more fuels, two-component droplets and wider oxygen and pressure ranges.

What burned
Liquid fuel
Propanol / glycerol, iso-octane, n-octane and 4 more
Where
On the space station
In orbit, where everything is weightless
How much data
8 table rows
NASA's table groups the tests, so one row can hold several
What they changed between tests
- fuel and fuel blend
- oxygen concentration
- pressure
- diluent gas
- droplet size
- flow speed
What it found
The chamber atmosphere was taken up to 40% oxygen and from half to three atmospheres of pressure.
NASA's words
“varied in pressure between 0.5 atm to 3.0 atm and O2 concentration between 0.1 to 0.4 mole fraction” PSI record
Summarized by the SI. Each summary is tied to a quotation that the build checks against NASA's text. A matching quote is not a scientific review.
What it helps with
Stopping a fire from starting
Which materials burn, and in what air
A clear part
Noticing a fire early
What smoke looks like to a detector
Not an aim
Putting a fire out
What makes a flame go out
A clear part
For researchers: NASA's full recordThe conditions tested, every row of the table, NASA's description, publications and hardware
Shared hardware: Three droplet experiments used the same apparatus inside the same rack as ACME. Experiments that shared hardware share its limits, so their results can be compared directly.
Why it counts as fire-safety research
“Study flame extinction mechanisms and their boundaries.” PSI record
NASA's words behind each rating
- Prevention2 of 3
“Determine the influence of droplet interactions on the flammability limits and extinction behavior of droplet arrays.”
- Detection0 of 3
Not an aim of this investigation.
- Suppression2 of 3
“Study flame extinction mechanisms and their boundaries.”
Conditions covered
- Oxygen in the atmosphere
- 17% to 30%
- airMoon
- Pressure
- 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa
- Moonsea level
- Flow speed
- 0.1 to 5 cm/s
- Itemized rows
- 8
- 8 envelopes
Fuels and materials
propanol / glycerol (2), iso-octane (1), n-octane (1), n-heptane (1), n-decane (1), ethanol (1), n-heptane / iso-octane (1)
Measurements named in the PSI record
- Flame imaging
- Soot measurement
How the tests differ, and how they are the same
Worked out from the 8 rows of the PSI table. A variable that is not listed was not reported, which is different from being held fixed.
Changed from test to test
- Fuel or material
- 7 different values
The same in every test
- Oxygen
- 17% to 30%
- Oxygen refers to
- ambient
- Pressure
- 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa
- Diluent
- N2 or He
- Flow speed
- 0.1 cm/s to 5 cm/s
- Ambient temperature
- 25 °C
- Fuel phase
- liquid
- Fuel fraction
- 100%
- Geometry
- droplet
- Characteristic size
- 1.5 mm to 5 mm
Rows from the PSI table
Click a row for the source of every value. Filter and export
| Record | Type | Fuel or material | Shape | Oxygen | Pressure | Flow, cm/s | Outcome | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IsoOctane (pure) | Envelope | iso-octane | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 | ||
| n-Octane (pure) | Envelope | n-octane | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 | ||
| Heptane (pure) | Envelope | n-heptane | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 | ||
| Decane (pure) | Envelope | n-decane | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 | ||
| Ethanol (pure) | Envelope | ethanol | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 | ||
| Propanol (95%) Glycerol (5%) (mixture) | Envelope | propanol / glycerol | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 | ||
| Heptane (50%) IsoOctane (50%) (mixture) | Envelope | n-heptane / iso-octane | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 | ||
| Propanol (80%) Glycerol (20%) (mixture) | Envelope | propanol / glycerol | droplet | 17% to 30% | 50.7 kPa to 304 kPa | 0.1 to 5 |
How the table was read, and what was repaired
FLEX-2 - test envelope by fuel
PSI-68_Experimental table_Flex2.csv
8 rows in the file, 8 kept as records. Envelope: PSI lists, for each fuel, the levels of oxygen and pressure that were used, not the individual droplet burns.
sha256 cc57ad1bd9977aa13e7ac6c3aa618303012686e232b36c052c6a9f1a74e5f528 · fetched 2026-11-11
NASA's description
Objectives
The primary goal of the FLEX-2 flight experiments is to extend the results of FLEX-1 to fuels and environmental conditions that mimic real combustor conditions, as well as, provide benchmark experimental data on bi-component droplet combustion over a wide range of initial conditions in order to validate numerical simulations and to develop new theoretical models. Detailed experimental objectives can be further itemized as: 1. Investigate the role of liquid-phase mixing on the burning characteristics of bi-component fuel droplets. 2. Examine the steady and unsteady liquid and gas-phase phenomena in pure fuel combustion. 3. Study flame extinction mechanisms and their boundaries. 4. Analyze the soot formation process, including soot volume fraction soot-shell dynamics. 5. Determine the influence of droplet interactions on the flammability limits and extinction behavior of droplet arrays. 6. Validate theoretical models of droplet combustion through comprehensive experimental data collection in microgravity environments.
Approach
The chamber was filled with the appropriate atmosphere, which was varied in pressure between 0.5 atm to 3.0 atm and O2 concentration between 0.1 to 0.4 mole fraction with the diluent gas making up the balance. A settling time of approximately 2 minutes elapsed prior to initiating the test in order to ensure that the temperature and pressure of the chamber gases have stabilized. This settling time was followed by the dispensing of a predetermined amount of fuel (based on the target droplet size) onto the support fiber for those tests in which the droplet is not freely deployed. When sufficient fuel has been dispensed the dispensing needles were retracted and a dwell period of at least 10 seconds was allowed for the droplet internal fluid motion induced by deployment to subside. This was then followed by initiating power to the ignitor for a selectable amount of time ranging from 1 second to 5 seconds after which the ignitor was retracted from the field of view. If the flow field is to be generated by translating the droplet then droplet motion would commence at the same time that the ignitor is retracted. A near real-time download of the color camera video was employed in order to verify successful droplet deployment, ignition, and overall progress of the experiment. Pressure and temperature data of the chamber environment was also recorded in near real time. The overall investigation approach can be summarized as: 1. Test parameters are determined, including pressure, temperature, fuel mixture, and humidity. 2. Fill the combustion chamber with the selected gas mixtures. 3. Deploy the droplet(s) carefully controlling the droplet diameter. 4. Allow the droplet to stabilize in the microgravity environment. 5. Ignite the droplet in a uniform and controlled fashion. 6. Monitor combustions and track flame evolution using high speed photography. 7. Monitor and adjust experimental conditions as needed. 8. Analyze data. The independently varied experimental parameters during FLEX-2 experiments were 1) Fuel type 2) Ambient gas composition 3) Ambient Pressure 4) Droplet initial diameter 5) Droplet translation velocity (and acceleration) 6) Droplet spacing and initial size in a binary linear array.
Hypothesis
Fairly sophisticated numerical simulations of convective droplet combustion have been developed in the last decade where the key contribution is the inclusion of full Navier-Stokes equations for the gas-phase flow field. However, due to the inherent complexity of the problem, varying degrees of approximations have been made in treating the chemistry, radiation, and the coupling between the gas and liquid phases. The validity of the assumptions or the hypothesis used in these simulation have not been confirmed by using benchmark data. By conducting these experiments in a microgravity environment, the effects of buoyancy are minimized, and the droplet can be characterized only as a function of thermocapillary or solutalcapillary stresses allowing for a clear observation of the fundamental combustion processes, The present FLEX-2 experiments using bi-component mixtures. In addition, the microgravity environment allows study of such phenomena as the transitions between radiative and diffusive extension of the flame. The primary goal of the flight experiments is to provide benchmark experimental data on bi-component droplet combustion over a wide range of initial conditions that could be used to validate numerical simulations and to develop new theoretical models.
Research impacts and Earth benefits
The combustion of liquid fuels is the overwhelming energy source in the transportation sector. Insights gained from these studies can lead to more efficient and cleaner combustion technologies which are crucial for reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. By improving fuel efficiency and developing better fuels, these experiments can contribute to: 1) More sustainable energy production. 2) Future combustor designs with minimal carbon footprint, maximum fuel efficiency and less pollutant emissions. 3) Allow quantitative evaluation of the performance of future fuels in combustors through the development of surrogates (mixtures of pure fuels that simulate the behavior of real fuels). 4) Validation of jet engine models by engine manufacturers with support from prior droplet results.
Publications
48 listed in PSI, 36 with a DOI.
- Experimental Study of Initial Diameter Effects on Convection-free Droplet Combustion in the Standard Atmosphere for n-Heptane, n-Octane, and n-Decane: International Space Station and Ground-based ExperimentsYC Liu, CT Avedisian, KN Trenou, JK Rah, MC Hicks
- n-Butanol droplet combustion: Numerical modeling and reduced gravity experimentsFE Alam, YC Liu, CT Avedisian, FL Dryer, TI Farouk
- Droplet Combustion Experiments Aboard the International Space StationDietrich Daniel L., Nayagam Vedha, Hicks Michael C., Ferkul Paul V., Dryer Frederick L., Farouk Tanvir, Shaw Benjamin D., Suh Hyun Kyu, Choi Mun Y., Liu Yu Cheng, Avedisian C. Thomas, Williams Forman A.
- Multistage oscillatory “Cool Flame” behavior for isolated alkane droplet combustion in elevated pressure microgravity conditionTI Farouk, MC Hicks, FL Dryer
- Computational modeling of the effects of support fibers on evaporation of fiber-supported droplets in reduced gravityN Ghata, BD Shaw
- Oxygen Lewis Number Effects on Reduced Gravity Combustion of Methanol and Heptane DropletsShaw Benjamin D., Vang Chang L.
Show the other 42
- ISS Droplet Combustion Experiments - Uncertainties in Droplet Sizes and Burning RatesShaw Benjamin D.
- Combustion of Butanol, Gasoline, and Butanol/Gasoline Mixture DropletsXu Yuhao, Avedisian C. Thomas
- Computational Modeling of Unsupported and Fiber-Supported n-Heptane Droplet Combustion in Reduced Gravity: A Study of Fiber EffectsGhata Narugopal, Shaw Benjamin D.
- The effect of support fibers on micro-convection in droplet combustion experimentsYC Liu, Y Xu, CT Avedisian, MC Hicks
- Cool-flame extinction during n-alkane droplet combustion in microgravityV Nayagam, DL Dietrich, MC Hicks, FA Williams
- A short mechanism for the low-temperature ignition of n-heptane at high pressuresJC Prince, FA Williams, GE Ovando
- The role of cool-flame chemistry in quasi-steady combustion and extinction of n-heptane dropletsPaczko Guenter, Peters Norbert, Seshadri Kalyanasundaram, Williams Forman Arthur
- Combustion of Submillimeter Heptane/Methanol and Heptane/Ethanol Droplets in Reduced GravityAharon I., Tam V. K., Shaw B. D.
- Isolated n-heptane droplet combustion in microgravity: “Cool Flames” – Two-stage combustionFarouk Tanvir I., Dryer Frederick L.
- Sub-millimeter sized methyl butanoate droplet combustion: Microgravity experiments and detailed numerical modelingFarouk T.I., Liu Y.C., Savas A.J., Avedisian C.T., Dryer F.L.
- On the spherically symmetrical combustion of methyl decanoate droplets and comparisons with detailed numerical modelingYC Liu, T Farouk, AJ Savas, FL Dryer, CT Avedisian
- The spherically symmetric droplet burning characteristics of Jet-A and biofuels derived from camelina and tallowYC Liu, AJ Savas, CT Avedisian
- Spherically symmetric droplet combustion of three and four component miscible mixtures as surrogates for Jet-AYC Liu, AJ Savas, CT Avedisian
- AUTOMATED DATA ANALYSIS FOR CONSECUTIVE IMAGES FROM DROPLET COMBUSTION EXPERIMENTSDembia Christopher Lee, Liu Yu Cheng, Avedisian C. Thomas
- On the extinction characteristics of alcohol droplet combustion under microgravity conditions – A numerical studyFarouk Tanvir I., Dryer Frederick L.
- A comparison of the spherical flame characteristics of sub-millimeter droplets of binary mixtures of n-heptane/iso-octane and n-heptane/toluene with a commercial unleaded gasolineLiu Yu Cheng, Avedisian C. Thomas
- Comparison of the Burning Characteristics of Indolene and Commercial Grade Gasoline Droplets without ConvectionLiu Yu Cheng, Savas Anthony J., Avedisian C. Thomas
- Can cool flames support quasi-steady alkane droplet burning?V Nayagam, DL Dietrich, PV Ferkul, MC Hicks, FA Williams
- Experiments on Submillimeter Free Droplet Flame ExtinctionShaw B. D., Wang D. F.
- Influences of support fibers on vaporizing fuel dropletsD Shringi, HA Dwyer, BD Shaw
- Combustion of Methanol Droplets in Air-Diluent Environments with Reduced and Normal GravityShaw Benjamin, Wei Jingbin
- Microgravity droplet combustion: effect of tethering fiber on burning rate and flame structureFarouk T., Dryer F. L.
- Influence of Gravity and Ambient Pressure on Combustion and Flammability of n-Heptane and 1-Propanol Droplets in Air-Diluent EnvironmentsShaw B. D., Wei J. B.
- Ignition and combustion of n-heptane droplets in carbon dioxide enriched environmentsDzik Justin, Nayagam Vedha, Williams Forman A.
- Computational modeling of n-heptane droplet combustion in air–diluent environments under reduced-gravityJin Y., Shaw B.D.
- Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Flows and Shape Oscillations in Liquid Droplets Induced by Deployment Needle RetractionYan Jin, Shaw Benjamin D.
- Nonane droplet combustion with and without buoyant convection: Flame structure, burning rate and extinction in air and heliumBae J.H., Avedisian C.T.
- Temperature and fiber optic spectroscopy composition measurements of heated propanol–acetone dropletsXiao J.S., Wei J.B., Shaw B.D., Peng Z.
- Laser-induced fluorescence imaging of acetone inside evaporating and burning fuel dropletsDS Shringi, BD Shaw, HA Dwyer
- Reduced Gravity Combustion of Propanol Droplets in Oxygen-Inert EnvironmentsWei J. B., Shaw B. D.
- PROPANOL DROPLET FLAMMABILITY AND COMBUSTION IN AIR-DILUENT ENVIRONMENTS UNDER NORMAL AND REDUCED GRAVITYSHAW B. D., WEI J. B.
- Developing Surrogates for Liquid Transportation Fuels: The Role of Spherically Symmetric Droplet CombustionAvedisian C. Thomas
- Experimental Observations of the Low-Temperature Burning of Decane/Hexanol Droplets in MicrogravityDietrich D. L., Calabria R., Massoli P., Nayagam V., Williams F. A.
- Cool-flame dodecane-droplet extinction diametersWilliams Forman A., Nayagam Vedha
- Quasi-steady combustion of normal-alkane droplets supported by Cool-Flame chemistry near diffusive extinctionWilliams Forman A., Nayagam Vedha
- Radiative extinction of burner-supported spherical diffusion flames: A scaling analysisNayagam Vedha, Dietrich Daniel L., Williams Forman A.
- Unsteady droplet combustion with fuel thermal expansionNayagam Vedha, Dietrich Daniel L., Williams Forman A.
- Radiative extinction of large n-alkane droplets in oxygen-inert mixtures in microgravityNayagam Vedha, Dietrich Daniel L., Hicks Michael C., Williams Forman A.
- A Burke-Schumann analysis of dual-flame structure supported by a burning dropletNayagam Vedha, Dietrich Daniel L., Williams Forman A.
- A Burke–Schumann analysis of diffusion-flame structures supported by a burning dropletNayagam Vedha, Dietrich Daniel L., Williams Forman A.
- Dynamic Differential Image Circle Diameter Measurement Precision Assessment: Application to Burning DropletsRB Rasul, CT Avedisian, Y Xu, MC Hicks, AP Reeves
- Interpretation of Backlit Droplet Images from ISS Droplet Combustion ExperimentsYu Fei, Shaw Benjamin D.
Hardware and raw data
1.2 TB of raw data on PSI. FlameLens reads the experimental table, not the raw video or sensor files.
On Earth
Cleaner combustion: Benchmark droplet data for cleaner, more efficient liquid-fuel combustors.
“The combustion of liquid fuels is the overwhelming energy source in the transportation sector.”