Skip to content

Ask the SI:

Experiments / SPICE flow duct

BASS-IIA spacecraft fire-safety study

Burning and Suppression of Solids - II

Mapped ignition, flame spread and extinction limits of rods, slabs, films and fabric as oxygen was lowered and airflow changed.

NASA's own record
A plastic rod burning in a gentle airflow on the International Space Station.
A rod burning in BASS-II. NASA photograph, from PSI.

What burned

Solid materials

Acrylic plastic, cotton fabric, flame-resistant fabric and 1 more

Where

On the space station

In orbit, where everything is weightless

How much data

129 tests

Each one is a row in NASA's table

What they changed between tests

  • oxygen concentration
  • flow speed and direction
  • sample material
  • sample shape
  • sample thickness

What it found

  1. 1 of 2

    Oxygen was only varied downward from 21%, by adding nitrogen - so BASS-II measures limits below cabin oxygen, not the enriched atmospheres planned for the Moon.

    NASA's words

    “Main variables are airflow speed and oxygen concentration (oxygen varied below 21% by adding nitrogen).” PSI record

  2. 2 of 2

    The upward-burning screening test used on Earth may not be the worst case in space.

    NASA's words

    “NASA tests and controls materials from a flammability perspective using an upward burning test in normal gravity, which is considered to be the worst-case geometry” PSI record

Summarized by the SI. Each summary is tied to a quotation that the build checks against NASA's text. A matching quote is not a scientific review.

What it helps with

  • Stopping a fire from starting

    Which materials burn, and in what air

    A main aim

  • Noticing a fire early

    What smoke looks like to a detector

    Touches on it

  • Putting a fire out

    What makes a flame go out

    A clear part

For researchers: NASA's full recordThe conditions tested, every row of the table, NASA's description, publications and hardware
ISSMicrogravity InvestigationSPICE flow ductCompare with othersdoi:10.60555/4qc4-de67

Shared hardware: One small fan-driven wind tunnel, built for SPICE, was reused for solids and for jet flames. Experiments that shared hardware share its limits, so their results can be compared directly.

Why it counts as fire-safety research

“Flammability studies focus on solid materials such as fabrics and plastics, as studied in the Burning and Suppression of Solids (BASS and BASS-II) and Spacecraft Fire Safety Demonstration (Saffire-I, -II, and -III) investigations.” NASA challenge statement

NASA's words behind each rating

  • Prevention3 of 3

    “Study the ignition, flame growth, flame spread, and extinction limits for solid fuels burning in low-velocity forced flows in microgravity.”

  • Detection1 of 3

    “BASS-II results contribute to the combustion computational models used in the design of fire detection and suppression systems in microgravity and on Earth.”

  • Suppression2 of 3

    “BASS-II results contribute to the combustion computational models used in the design of fire detection and suppression systems in microgravity and on Earth.”

Conditions covered

Oxygen in the atmosphere
13.6% to 22.2%
Pressure
99.2 kPa to 101 kPa
Flow speed
0 to 53 cm/s
Itemized rows
129
129 tests

Fuels and materials

PMMA (98), SIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass) (27), Nomex (3), Japan wax (1)

Measurements named in the PSI record

  • Gas analysis
  • Flow velocity

How the tests differ, and how they are the same

Worked out from the 129 rows of the PSI table. A variable that is not listed was not reported, which is different from being held fixed.

Changed from test to test

Oxygen
13.6% to 22.2%
Pressure
99.2 kPa to 101 kPa
Flow speed
0 cm/s to 53 cm/sreported in 125 of 129 rows
Flow direction
3 different valuesreported in 120 of 129 rows
Fuel or material
4 different values
Geometry
6 different values
Characteristic size
6.35 mm to 40 mmreported in 56 of 129 rows
Sample thickness
0.1 mm to 5 mmreported in 42 of 129 rows
Sample width
1 cm to 2 cmreported in 69 of 129 rows
Ignited
2 different valuesreported in 36 of 129 rows
Burn time
384 s to 1,842 sreported in 20 of 129 rows
How the test ended
5 different valuesreported in 93 of 129 rows
Flame spread rate
0.012 mm/s to 0.144 mm/sreported in 18 of 129 rows
Oxygen at end of test
13.5% to 22.2%reported in 122 of 129 rows
Carbon dioxide at end of test
0.2% to 3.2%reported in 123 of 129 rows
Carbon monoxide at end of test
0.3 ppm to 950 ppmreported in 124 of 129 rows

The same in every test

Oxygen refers to
ambient
Diluent
N2
Fuel phase
solid

Rows from the PSI table

Click a row for the source of every value. Filter and export

RecordTypeFuel or materialShapeOxygenPressureFlow, cm/sOutcomeDate
B1TestPMMAthin film22.2%101 kPaassumed5flow terminated2014-02-19
B2TestPMMAthin film22.2%101 kPaassumed52014-02-19
B3TestPMMAthin film22.2%99.2 kPa to 99.5 kPa22014-02-19
B4TestPMMAthin film22.2%99.2 kPa to 99.5 kPa52014-02-19
B5TestPMMAthin film22.2%101 kPaassumed52014-02-19
B6TestPMMAthin film21%101 kPaassumed3 to 10burned to completion2014-07-07
B7TestPMMAthin film22.2%101 kPaassumed22014-02-19
B8TestPMMAthin film21%101 kPaassumed102014-07-07
B9TestPMMAthin film21%101 kPaassumed2extinction2014-07-07
B10TestPMMAthin film21%101 kPaassumed1 to 5extinction2014-07-07
B11TestPMMAthin film21%99.2 kPa to 99.5 kPa1 to 5extinction2014-07-07
B12TestPMMAthin film22.2%101 kPaassumed22014-02-19
B13TestPMMAthin film21%99.2 kPa to 99.5 kPa1 to 10extinction2014-07-07
B14TestPMMAthin film15%101 kPaassumed2 to 5extinction2014-07-02
B15TestPMMAthin film21%101 kPaassumed102014-07-07
B16TestPMMAthin film17.3%101 kPaassumed3extinction2014-07-02
B17TestPMMAthin film17.5%101 kPaassumed3 to 5extinction2014-07-02
B18TestPMMAthin film17.4%101 kPaassumed10blowoff2014-07-02
B19TestPMMAthin film17.3%101 kPaassumed10blowoff2014-07-02
B20TestPMMAthin film17.4%101 kPaassumed3 to 5burned to completion2014-07-02
B21TestPMMAthin film20.8%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-08-04
B22TestPMMAthin film20.7%101 kPaassumed0 to 5extinction2014-08-04
F1TestNomexfabric sheet22.2%101 kPaassumed9.5extinction2014-02-19
F2TestNomexfabric sheet21%101 kPaassumed15did not ignite2014-07-28
F3TestNomexfabric sheet21.7%101 kPaassumed8did not ignite2014-08-01
F4TestJapan waxcandle17.4%101 kPaassumed3extinction2014-06-24
M1TestPMMAslab22.2%101 kPaassumed8 to 10flow terminated2014-02-20
M2TestPMMAslab22.2%101 kPaassumed13 to 20self-extinguished2014-02-20
M3TestPMMAslab20.8%101 kPaassumed10 to 20extinction2014-07-11
M4TestPMMAslab21.8%101 kPaassumed3 to 5extinction2014-07-31
M5TestPMMAslab22.2%101 kPaassumed5 to 20extinction2014-02-20
M6TestPMMAslab21.8%101 kPaassumed0 to 102014-07-31
M7TestPMMAslab18.9%101 kPaassumed3 to 10burned to completion2014-07-11
M8TestPMMAslab19.1%101 kPaassumed5 to 10extinction2014-07-11
M9TestPMMAslab18%101 kPaassumed10 to 14extinction2014-07-11
M10TestPMMAslab20.1%101 kPaassumed8 to 17self-extinguished2014-07-23
M11TestPMMAslab20%101 kPaassumed10 to 20extinction2014-07-11
M12TestPMMAslab21.7%101 kPaassumed2014-07-31
M13TestPMMAslab20.8%101 kPaassumed4 to 6extinction2014-07-31
M14TestPMMAslab22.2%101 kPaassumed8 to 10self-extinguished2014-02-20
M15TestPMMAslab21%101 kPaassumed7 to 20extinction2014-07-07
M16TestPMMAslab19.2%101 kPaassumed1 to 102014-07-23
M17TestPMMAslab18.8%101 kPaassumed0 to 10flow terminated2014-07-15
M18TestPMMAslab17.9%101 kPaassumed8 to 15extinction2014-07-15
M19TestPMMAslab19%101 kPaassumed5 to 17self-extinguished2014-07-23
M20TestPMMAslab18%101 kPaassumed8 to 10extinction2014-08-01
O1TestPMMArod22.2%101 kPaassumed1 to 202014-02-18
O2TestPMMArod22.2%101 kPaassumed02014-02-18
O3aTestPMMArod18%101 kPaassumed3 to 5extinction2014-06-13
O3bTestPMMArod18%101 kPaassumed1 to 52014-06-13
O4TestPMMArod14.8%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-07-08
O5aTestPMMArod15.1%101 kPaassumed0 to 10blowoff2014-07-21
O5bTestPMMArod14.2%101 kPaassumed5did not ignite2014-07-21
O6TestPMMArod16.7%101 kPaassumedextinction2014-06-26
O7TestPMMArod16%101 kPaassumedblowoff2014-06-26
O8aTestPMMArod15.7%101 kPaassumedextinction2014-06-26
O8bTestPMMArod15.5%101 kPaassumedblowoff2014-06-26
O9TestPMMArod15%101 kPaassumedblowoff2014-06-26
O10TestPMMArod16.7%101 kPaassumed0 to 5blowoff2014-07-22
O11TestPMMArod15.4%101 kPaassumed5blowoff2014-07-08
O12TestPMMArod13.6%101 kPaassumeddid not ignite2014-07-08
O13aTestPMMArod15.9%101 kPaassumedself-extinguished2014-07-21
O13bTestPMMArod14.6%101 kPaassumed4 to 7extinction2014-07-21
O14TestPMMArod16.3%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-08-01
O15aTestPMMArod17.1%101 kPaassumed0 to 5extinction2014-07-28
O15bTestPMMArod16.7%101 kPaassumed0 to 5extinction2014-07-28
O16TestPMMArod14.5%101 kPaassumed5did not ignite2014-07-29
O17TestPMMArod15.1%101 kPaassumed0 to 11blowoff2014-07-22
O18TestPMMArod15.2%101 kPaassumed0 to 11blowoff2014-07-28
O19TestPMMArod15.3%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-08-01
O20TestPMMArod16.5%101 kPaassumed5 to 38.52016-02-26
O21TestPMMArod15.9%101 kPaassumed282016-02-26
O22TestPMMArod15.4%101 kPaassumed4 to 26.5blowoff2016-02-26
P1TestPMMArod17.7%101 kPaassumed2 to 5extinction2014-06-16
P2TestPMMArod17.4%101 kPaassumed2 to 5flow terminated2014-06-16
P3aTestPMMArod17.7%101 kPaassumed2.5 to 5extinction2014-06-16
P3bTestPMMArod17.4%101 kPaassumed52014-06-16
P4TestPMMArod18.5%101 kPaassumed5flow terminated2014-07-03
P5TestPMMArod19.3%101 kPaassumed5flow terminated2014-07-14
P6TestPMMArod18.9%101 kPaassumed5flow terminated2014-07-03
P8TestPMMArod16.4%101 kPaassumed5 to 15did not ignite2014-07-03
P9TestPMMArod17.6%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-07-14
P10TestPMMArod17%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-07-03
P12TestPMMArod17.5%101 kPaassumed0.5 to 5extinction2014-07-29
P13aTestPMMArod20.7%101 kPaassumed5flow terminated2014-07-14
P13bTestPMMArod20.6%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-07-14
P14TestPMMArod18.4%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-06-23
P15TestPMMArod18%101 kPaassumed52014-06-23
P16TestPMMArod18.2%101 kPaassumed2 to 8extinction2014-07-22
P17TestPMMArod16.8%101 kPaassumed2 to 22extinction2014-07-29
P18TestPMMArod20%101 kPaassumed0 to 2extinction2014-07-30
P19TestPMMArod17.5%101 kPaassumed0 to 8extinction2014-07-22
P20TestPMMArod19%101 kPaassumed0 to 2extinction2014-07-30
P21aTestPMMArod16.3%101 kPaassumed5self-extinguished2014-06-23
P21bTestPMMArod16.3%101 kPaassumed52014-06-23
P22aTestPMMArod20.8%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-07-08
P22bTestPMMArod20%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-07-08
P23TestPMMArod18.2%101 kPaassumed0 to 2extinction2014-07-30
P24TestPMMArod19%101 kPaassumed0 to 2extinction2014-07-30
P25TestPMMArod20.9%101 kPaassumed5extinction2014-07-08
T1TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet18.5%101 kPa102014-02-14
T2TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet18.5%101 kPa4 to 92014-02-14
T3TestPMMAsphere17.2%101 kPaassumed10extinction2014-06-27
T4TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet18.7%101 kPa1 to 9extinction2014-02-14
T5TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet18.8%101 kPa1 to 102014-04-10
T6TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet18.8%101 kPa1 to 52014-04-10
T7TestPMMAsphere17.3%101 kPaassumed1 to 10extinction2014-07-09
T9TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet16.4%101 kPa10extinction2018-06-24
T10TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet16.4%101 kPa5extinction2014-06-24
T11TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.1%101 kPa5burned to completion2014-06-27
T12TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet16.8%101 kPa5extinction2014-06-27
T13TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.5%101 kPa1 to 5extinction2014-04-10
T14TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet16.9%101 kPa3 to 5extinction2014-06-27
T15TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet18.7%101 kPa9 to 292014-02-14
T16TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.6%101 kPa3 to 5burned to completion2014-04-10
T17TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet16.9%101 kPa6 to 532014-06-27
T18TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.4%101 kPa2 to 5extinction2018-06-24
T19TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.2%101 kPa112014-07-09
T20TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.2%101 kPa3 to 11extinction2014-07-09
T21TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.2%101 kPa11blowoff2014-07-09
T22TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.1%101 kPa5 to 10extinction2014-07-09
T23TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet17.2%101 kPa10did not ignite2014-07-09
T24TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet18.2%101 kPa102014-07-09
T25TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet20.8%101 kPa2.5 to 52014-08-04
T26TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet20.8%101 kPa2.5 to 52014-08-04
T27TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet20.7%101 kPa2 to 5burned to completion2014-08-04
T28aTestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet20.7%101 kPa5extinction2014-08-04
T28bTestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet20.7%101 kPa5extinction2014-08-04
T29TestSIBAL fabric (cotton/fiberglass)fabric sheet20.7%101 kPa2 to 5extinction2014-08-04
How the table was read, and what was repaired

BASS-II - solid-fuel burns

PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv

129 rows in the file, 129 kept as records. The air speed of each test is read from the Air display column, which NASA's ReadMe for this experiment defines as the flow speed measured in the duct, in cm/s. In many tests the crew changed the flow while the sample burned, often lowering it until the flame went out, so one test can list several speeds. Fan display and flow restrictor settings are kept as originally logged.

Assumed: Not listed in the PSI table. Taken as ISS cabin pressure, because the experiment ran inside the Microgravity Science Glovebox.

sha256 71e792bf6b5fb5ea620c5dd70fbbac05515992e12aefcf5dff47312caa48c042 · fetched 2026-11-11

Repairs and warnings

  • Oxygen at end of test: 3 value(s) fall outside the expected range 0.05 to 1 fraction (1.6, 0.6, 0.9). They are kept exactly as published, flagged, and left out of charts.
  • Oxygen at end of test: 2 value(s) are more than 2 points above the oxygen at the start of the same test. Burning uses oxygen up, so this cannot be a reading of the same air. They are kept exactly as published, flagged, and left out of charts.
  • M17, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv gives "extinction" (row 43, column Air display). The first is the one used.
  • M17, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Science Documents_BASS-II_Test.Matrices.xlsx gives "extinction" (Miller!H18). The first is the one used.
  • P5, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv gives "extinction" (row 79, column Air display). The first is the one used.
  • P5, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Science Documents_BASS-II_Test.Matrices.xlsx gives "extinction" (Fernandez-Pello!H7). The first is the one used.
  • P13a, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Experimental table_BASS-II.csv gives "extinction" (row 85, column Air display). The first is the one used.
  • P13a, How the test ended: NASA's file PSI-25_Reports_BASS-II Summary Report.pdf gives "flow terminated"; NASA's file PSI-25_Science Documents_BASS-II_Test.Matrices.xlsx gives "extinction" (Fernandez-Pello!H13). The first is the one used.

NASA's description

Objectives

BASS-II results contribute to the combustion computational models used in the design of fire detection and suppression systems in microgravity and on Earth. Objectives Include: 1) Study the ignition, flame growth, flame spread, and extinction limits for solid fuels burning in low-velocity forced flows in microgravity. 2) Begin to bridge the gap between the normal gravity NASA-STD-6001 Test #1 method, ground-based microgravity tests, and actual material flammability in microgravity. 3) Provide SoFIE PIs with preliminary data to refine Science Requirements. 4) Practical, realistic (thicker) fuels in typical geometries will be examined, including slabs, cylinders, and spherical sections. The primary variables include: • Forced flow velocity (speed and direction) • Ambient oxygen concentration (via working volume nitrogen vitiation) • Sample geometry (rods, spherical section, slabs, films, and fabric sheets

Approach

To summarize, BASS-II's approach, microgravity combustion tests were performed aboard the International Space Station. Active crew support for real-time “lab partner” operations. The wind tunnel was installed in the Microgravity Science Glovebox which supplied power, imaging, and a level of containment. Fuel samples were mounted inside a small wind tunnel which could impose airflow speeds up to 40 cm/s. Main variables are airflow speed and oxygen concentration (oxygen varied below 21% by adding nitrogen). Flame appearance, flame growth, and spread rates were determined in both the opposed and concurrent flow.

Hypothesis

BASS–II tests the hypothesis that materials in microgravity, with adequate ventilation, burn as well if not better than the same material in normal gravity with other conditions being identical (pressure, O2 concentration, temperature, etc.). NASA tests and controls materials from a flammability perspective using an upward burning test in normal gravity, which is considered to be the worst-case geometry for flammability of the material on Earth. However, it may not be conservative for flammability in space. Testing at constant O2 mole fractions permits studying flame spread and extinction at low and high flow speed. We are interested in finding the fundamental limit for a given material.

Research impacts and Earth benefits

A primary goal of BASS-II is improved spacecraft fire safety, improved understanding of combustion in space and how to avoid it. If you’re on a mission far from Earth, a fire can be catastrophic. BASS-II helps engineers select the safest materials and improve firefighting methods on future space missions. In outer space, fuels burn as oval balls rather than with an upward pointed cone flame as they do on Earth. This simpler combustion process enables researchers to evaluate computer models of fuel burning. These models can then be used to more accurately study flames on Earth, such as in wildfires, building fires, energy recapture from waste recycling, and other combustion problems.

Publications

17 listed in PSI, 9 with a DOI.

  1. Microgravity flammability boundary for PMMA rods in axial stagnation flow: Experimental results and energy balance analysesOlson Sandra L., Ferkul Paul V.
  2. Temperature and CO2 fields of a downward spreading flame over thin cellulose: A comparison of experimental and computational resultsBhattacharjee Subrata, Paolini Christopher, Tran Wynn, Villaraza Jeanie Ray, Takahashi Shuhei
  3. Opposed-flow flame spread: A comparison of microgravity and normal gravity experiments to establish the thermal regimeBhattacharjee Subrata, Laue Matthew, Carmignani Luca, Ferkul Paul, Olson Sandra
  4. The critical flow velocity for radiative extinction in opposed-flow flame spread in a microgravity environment: A comparison of experimental, computational, and theoretical resultsBhattacharjee Subrata, Simsek Aslihan, Olson Sandra, Ferkul Paul
  5. Experimental validation of a correlation capturing the boundary layer effect on spread rate in the kinetic regime of opposed-flow flame spreadBhattacharjee Subrata, Tran Wynn, Laue Matthew, Paolini Christopher, Nakamura Yuji
  6. Results from on-board CSA-CP and CDM Sensor Readings during the Burning and Suppression of Solids - II (BASS-II) Experiment in the Microgravity Science Glovebox (MSG)SL Olson, PV Ferkul, S Bhattacharjee, FJ Miller, C Fernandez-Pello, S Link, JS Tien, I Wichman
Show the other 11
  1. Modeling and Analysis of Intermediate Thickness PMMA Sheets Burning in Microgravity Opposed FlowTJ Shah, FJ Miller, S Olson, I Wichman
  2. Concurrent flame growth, spread and extinction over composite fabric samples in low speed purely forced flow in microgravityX Zhao, JS Tien, PV Ferkul, S. Olson
  3. Radiative, thermal, and kinetic regimes of opposed-flow flame spread: A comparison between experiment and theoryBhattacharjee Subrata, Simsek Aslihan, Miller Fletcher, Olson Sandra, Ferkul Paul
  4. Concurrent flame growth, spread, and quenching over composite fabric samples in low speed purely forced flow in microgravityZhao Xiaoyang, Liao Ya-Ting T., Johnston Michael C., T'ien James S., Ferkul Paul V., Olson Sandra L.
  5. A Study of the Effectiveness of a Narrow Channel Apparatus in Simulating Microgravity Flame Spread over Thin FuelsPepper Jacob, Miller Fletcher, Olson Sandra, Wichman Indrek
  6. BASS-II Summary ReportJ Marcum, S Olson, P Ferkul
  7. Correlation of normal gravity mixed convection blowoff limits with microgravity forced flow blowoff limitsJW Marcum, SL Olson, PV Ferkul
  8. Fire in MicrogravityHariharan Ashwin, Miller Fletcher, Olson Sandra, Wichman Indrek
  9. Microgravity Flammability of PMMA Rods in Concurrent FlowSL Olson, PV Ferkul
  10. Using a Narrow Channel Apparatus to Study Thermally-Intermediate Fuel Combustion in a Simulated 0g EnvironmentG Bornand, G Sullivan, T Shah, F Miller
  11. Burning and Suppression of Solids – II Fire Safety Investigation for the Microgravity Science GloveboxSL Olson, PV Ferkul, S Bhattacharjee, FJ Miller, AC Fernandez-Pello, JS Tien

Hardware and raw data

275 GB of raw data on PSI: reports 1, raw data 685, metadata 1, reference data 1, science documents 3, engineering documents 2, representative image(s) 1. FlameLens reads the experimental table, not the raw video or sensor files.

Linked investigations

On Earth

Fire models: Simpler microgravity flames validate fire models that are then applied to fires on Earth.

“These models can then be used to more accurately study flames on Earth”