Skip to content

Ask the SI:

Experiments / Ground studies

Supports fire safety

SAME smoke modelling

Simulated how smoke particles form and grow with and without gravity, using the SAME experiment as its reference case.

NASA's own record
An astronaut works at the glovebox on the space station.
SAME, the flight experiment this study used as its reference. Astronaut Clay Anderson at the hardware, September 2007. NASA photograph iss015e27411.

What burned

Solid materials

The things a cabin is made of

Where

On a computer

A computer study, not a new flight test

How much data

No test table

NASA's archive holds its report, not a table of tests

What they changed between tests

  • gravity level
  • cross-flow velocity

What it found

  1. The goal is to explain, not just record, why microgravity smoke differs from smoke on Earth.

    NASA's words

    “quantify the differences between microgravity and Earth gravity smoke, and to identify the fluid dynamic mechanisms that cause the differences” PSI record

Summarized by the SI. Each summary is tied to a quotation that the build checks against NASA's text. A matching quote is not a scientific review.

What it helps with

  • Stopping a fire from starting

    Which materials burn, and in what air

    Not an aim

  • Noticing a fire early

    What smoke looks like to a detector

    A clear part

  • Putting a fire out

    What makes a flame go out

    Not an aim

For researchers: NASA's full recordThe conditions tested, every row of the table, NASA's description, publications and hardware
ComputationalGround InvestigationGround studiesCompare with othersdoi:10.60555/q0v5-1v28

Shared hardware: Later studies that took flight data from PSI and built models or follow-up experiments on it. Experiments that shared hardware share its limits, so their results can be compared directly.

Why it counts as fire-safety research

“This would directly lead to better smoke detection devices and prevent fires that can lead to loss of materiel and loss of life.” PSI record

NASA's words behind each rating

  • Prevention0 of 3

    Not an aim of this investigation.

  • Detection2 of 3

    “This would directly lead to better smoke detection devices and prevent fires that can lead to loss of materiel and loss of life.”

  • Suppression0 of 3

    Not an aim of this investigation.

Conditions covered

Oxygen in the atmosphere
not reported
not in the PSI table
Pressure
not reported
not in the PSI table
Flow speed
not reported
not in the PSI table
Itemized rows
0
no table in PSI

Fuels and materials

Not itemized in PSI.

Measurements named in the PSI record

  • Numerical simulation

NASA's description

Objectives

The objective of this investigation was to use numerical simulation to explore the influence of gravity on pyrolysis smoke growth from a fundamental perspective. The intention of this effort is to quantify the differences between microgravity and Earth gravity smoke, and to identify the fluid dynamic mechanisms that cause the differences.

Approach

The formation and growth of dibutyl-phthalate (DBP) particles in Earth gravity and microgravity environments was simulated. Direct numerical simulation via a Navier-Stokes nodal approach was utlilized. The smoke originates from pyrolysis vapor expelled from a heated sample in a geometry similar to that considered in the SAME experiments. This study considered two cross-flow velocities of sufficiently low speed that buoyancy cannot be neglected in the presence of gravity. Simulations are presented to assess the dependence of particle size distributions on thermophoresis, particle settling, and flow geometry. The final report for this investigation introduces the simulation and modeling methodology, followed by a description of the flow geometry and the parameter space under consideration.The differences in the wake geometry attributable to buoyancy for the lower of two flow speeds was examined. Instantaneous scalar fields were used to describe particle accumulation and growth in the buoyant and non-buoyant wakes that form downstream of the hot vapor source.

Hypothesis

Without buoyancy, mixing and heat transfer are reduced, the time-temperature history of the combustion vapors (or particle precursors) and particle trajectories are significantly altered, changing the composition of the smoke. The chemical composition of the burning material also affects the characteristics of the smoke generated.

Research impacts and Earth benefits

Models and tools that characterize particles generated as smoke can be used to ascertain how temperature, gravity, and material properties affect the smoke produced. This would directly lead to better smoke detection devices and prevent fires that can lead to loss of materiel and loss of life.

Publications

0 listed in PSI, 0 with a DOI.

    Hardware and raw data

      264 MB of raw data on PSI: reports 1, metadata 1, analyzed data 44, science documents 1. FlameLens reads the experimental table, not the raw video or sensor files.

      Linked investigations

      • SAME uses its flight data

      On Earth

      Smoke detection: Particle models that support better smoke detectors.

      “This would directly lead to better smoke detection devices”